Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BS ISO 15901-1:2016

$142.49

Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption – Mercury porosimetry

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2016 30
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This International Standard describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter and Drake [1] [2] . It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter.

Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa (60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general, without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper, nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
6 Foreword
7 Introduction
9 1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
12 4 Symbols and abbreviated terms
13 5 Principles
14 6 Apparatus and material
6.1 Sample holder
15 6.2 Porosimeter
6.3 Mercury
7 Procedures for calibration and performance
7.1 General
7.2 Pressure signal calibration
7.3 Volume signal calibration
7.4 Vacuum transducer calibration
16 7.5 Verification of porosimeter performance
8 Procedures
8.1 Sampling
8.1.1 Obtaining a test sample
8.1.2 Quantity of sample
17 8.2 Method
8.2.1 Sample pre-treatment
8.2.2 Filling of the sample holder and evacuation
8.2.3 Filling the sample holder with mercury
18 8.2.4 Measurement
8.2.5 Completion of test
8.2.6 Blank and sample compression correction
19 9 Evaluation
9.1 Determination of the pore size distribution
9.2 Determination of the specific pore volume
20 9.3 Determination of the specific surface area
9.4 Determination of the bulk and skeleton densities
21 9.5 Determination of the porosity
10 Reporting
22 Annex A (informative) Mercury porosimetry analysis results
25 Annex B (informative) Recommendations for the safe handling of mercury
27 Bibliography
BS ISO 15901-1:2016
$142.49