BS EN IEC 61496-3:2019
$215.11
Safety of machinery. Electro-sensitive protective equipment – Particular requirements for active opto-electronic protective devices responsive to diffuse Reflection (AOPDDR)
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2019 | 96 |
IEC 61496-3:2018 is available as /2 which contains the International Standard and its Redline version, showing all changes of the technical content compared to the previous edition. IEC 61496-3:2018 specifies additional requirements for the design, construction and testing of electro-sensitive protective equipment (ESPE) designed specifically to detect persons or parts of persons as part of a safety-related system, employing active opto-electronic protective devices responsive to diffuse reflection (AOPDDRs) for the sensing function. Special attention is directed to requirements which ensure that an appropriate safety-related performance is achieved. An ESPE can include optional safety-related functions, the requirements for which are given both in Annex A of this document and in Annex A of IEC 61496-1:2012. IEC 61496-3:2018 not specify the dimensions or configurations of the detection zone and its disposition in relation to hazardous parts for any particular application, nor what constitutes a hazardous state of any machine. It is restricted to the functioning of the ESPE and how it interfaces with the machine. AOPDDRs are devices that have either – one or more detection zone(s) specified in two dimensions (AOPDDR-2D), or – one or more detection zone(s) specified in three dimensions (AOPDDR-3D) wherein radiation in the near infrared range is emitted by an emitting element(s). When the emitted radiation impinges on an object (for example, a person or part of a person), a portion of the emitted radiation is reflected to a receiving element(s) by diffuse reflection. This reflection is used to determine the position of the object. Opto-electronic devices that perform only a single one-dimensional spot-like distance measurement, for example, optical proximity switches, are not covered by this document. IEC 61496-3:2018 does not address those aspects required for complex classification or differentiation of the object detected. IEC 61496-3:2018 does not address requirements and tests for outdoor application. Excluded from IEC 61496-3:2018 are AOPDDRs employing radiation with the peak of wavelength outside the range 820 nm to 950 nm, and those employing radiation other than that generated by the AOPDDR itself. For sensing devices that employ radiation of wavelengths outside this range, this document can be used as a guide. IEC 61496-3:2018 is relevant for AOPDDRs having a minimum detectable object size in the range from 30 mm to 200 mm. IEC 61496-3:2018 can be relevant to applications other than those for the protection of persons, for example, for the protection of machinery or products from mechanical damage. In those applications, different requirements can be appropiate, for example when the materials that have to be recognized by the sensing function have different properties from those of persons and their clothing. IEC 61496-3:2018 does not deal with electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) emission requirements. IEC 61496-3:2018 cancels and replaces the second edition published in 2008. This edition constitutes a technical revision. IEC 61496-3:2018 includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: a) extension of the scope from AOPDDR-2D to AOPDDR-3D; b) extension of the scope from Type 3 ESPE to Type 2 ESPE; c) implementation of requirements and test procedures for AOPDDR-3D and Type 2 ESPE; d) listing of reference boundary monitoring as an optional function of the ESPE; e) implementation of instructions for positioning of AOPDDR-3D in respect of parts of the human body; f) revised requirement for combinations of single faults with conditions for no failure to danger, see for example 4.2.2.4, last paragraph. IEC 61496-3:2018 is to be used in conjunction with IEC 61496-1:2012.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
5 | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
7 | English CONTENTS |
10 | FOREWORD |
12 | INTRODUCTION |
13 | 1 Scope |
14 | 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
16 | 4 Functional, design and environmental requirements 4.1 Functional requirements |
17 | 4.2 Design requirements |
21 | Figures Figure 1 – Detection zone of an AOPDDR-2D |
22 | Figure 2 – Detection zone of an AOPDDR-3D |
23 | Figure 3 – AOPDDR used as a trip device with orthogonal approach (200 mm minimum detectable object size) |
24 | Figure 4 – AOPDDR used as a trip device with orthogonal approach (150 mm minimum detectable object size) |
26 | Figure 5 – Minimum diffuse reflectivity of materials |
27 | 4.3 Environmental requirements |
30 | 5 Testing 5.1 General |
31 | 5.2 Functional tests |
32 | Figure 6 – Test piece intrusion into the detection zone for test |
33 | Tables Table 1 – Minimum tests required for the verification of detection capability requirements (see also 4.2.12.1) |
36 | Figure 7 – Influence on detection capability by incandescent light – Example 1 |
37 | Figure 8 – Influence on detection capability by incandescent light – Example 2 |
38 | Figure 9 – Influence on detection capability by light reflected by the background |
39 | Figure 10 – Configuration for the endurance test – Example 1 |
40 | Figure 11 – Configuration for the endurance test – Example 2 |
41 | 5.3 Performance testing under fault conditions |
42 | 5.4 Environmental tests |
46 | Table 2 – Overview of light interference tests |
52 | Figure 12 – Interference between two AOPDDR-3D of identical design (opposite arrangement) |
53 | Figure 13 – Interference between two AOPDDR-3D of identical design (parallel arrangement) |
55 | Figure 14 – Example of an emitting element of an AOPDDR Figure 15 – Example of a receiver of an AOPDDR |
57 | Figure 16 – Influence on detection capability by background |
58 | Figure 17 – Multi-path reflection test (top view) Figure 18 – Multi-path reflection test (side view) |
61 | 6 Marking for identification and for safe use 6.1 General |
62 | 7 Accompanying documents |
64 | Annexes Annex A (normative) Optional functions of the ESPE |
67 | Figure A.1 – Reference boundary monitoring – Distribution of measurement values |
68 | Figure A.2 – Use of an AOPDDR with reference boundary monitoring Figure A.3 – Use of an AOPDDR as parts of a body trip device |
70 | Annex B (normative) Catalogue of single faults affecting the electrical equipment of the ESPE, to be applied as specified in 5.3 |
71 | Annex AA (informative) Examples of the use of an AOPDDR in different applications AA.1 General AA.2 Example of the use of an AOPDDR-2D on machinery Figure AA.1 – Example of the use of an AOPDDR-2D on machinery |
72 | AA.3 Example of the use of an AOPDDR-2D on an automatic guided vehicle (AGV) |
73 | Figure AA.2 – Example of the use of an AOPDDR-2D on an AGV |
74 | AA.4 Positioning of AOPDDR-3D in respect of parts of the human body |
76 | Figure AA.3 – Minimum distance S – Example 1 |
77 | Figure AA.4 – Overall minimum distance So without tolerance zone – Example 1 |
78 | Figure AA.5 – Overall minimum distance So including tolerance zone – Example 1 |
79 | Figure AA.6 – Minimum distance S – Example 2 |
80 | Figure AA.7 – Overall minimum distance So without tolerance zone – Example 2 Figure AA.8 – Overall minimum distance So including tolerance zone – Example 2 |
82 | Figure AA.9 – Application example for body detection of an AOPDDR-3D |
83 | AA.5 Examples of the use of an AOPDDR |
84 | Figure AA.10 – Limited distance |
85 | Figure AA.11 – Overlap |
86 | AA.6 Detection zone angled to the direction of approach – orthogonal approach Figure AA.12 – Reference boundary monitoring – Distribution of measurement values |
87 | Figure AA.13 – AOPDDR-2D detection zone angled to the direction of approach – Orthogonal approach Figure AA.14 – AOPDDR-3D detection zone angled to the direction of approach – Orthogonal approach |
88 | AA.7 Example for the calculation of the response time of an AOPDDR-2D |
89 | Annex BB (informative) Relationship between position accuracy and probability of detection Figure BB.1 – Relationship between position accuracy and detection zone |
90 | Figure BB.2 – Relationship between position accuracy, detection zone and the probabilistic part of the tolerance zone – Example 1 |
91 | Figure BB.3 – Relationship between position accuracy, detection zone and the probabilistic part of the tolerance zone – Example 2 |
92 | Figure BB.4 – Relationship between position accuracy, detection zone and tolerance zone – Example 1 |
93 | Figure BB.5 – Relationship between position accuracy, detection zone and tolerance zone – Example 2 |
94 | Figure BB.6 – POD of a single measurement (logarithmic) for a MooM-evaluation with 1 ≤ M ≤ 50 Figure BB.7 – POD of a single measurement for a MooM-evaluation with 1 ≤ M ≤ 50 in relation to σ in the case of a normal distribution |
95 | Bibliography |